'The Good Bad-Man' is Excellent

The Good Bad-Man (1916/1923)
Starring: Douglas Fairbanks, Bessie Love, Sam de Grasse, and Pomeroy Cannon
Director: Allan Dwan
Rating: Eight of Ten Stars

"Passin' Through" (Fairbanks), a wandering outlaw with a heart of gold and a soft spot for those who are defenseless and in need, finds himself falling head-over-heels in love with a young woman (Love) he encounters by chance. This is sets in motion a series of events that will reveal "Passin'" mysterious past and change both their lives forever.

As I've mentioned before, I generally don't have the patience for silent dramas, especially if they run past the 15-20 minute mark. "The Good Bad-Man" is one of a growing number of films I've come across that are an exception to that rule. I don't know if my tastes have changed or if I've just had more luck with picking movies to watch in recent years.

Whatever the reason, I found "The Good Bad-Man" to be very entertaining. It's easy to see why Douglas Fairbanks was such a big star in his day, as he is seems equally natural whether his character is being friendly and playful, or whether he's getting ready to kill someone. 

In fact, like the other early Fairbanks picture I've watched and reviewed (the subversive Sherlock Holmes parody "The Mystery of the Leaping Fish"), he is the star of the film in very sense: He's the main character, he has all or is a key part of all the film's best moments, and he has a presence that almost leaps off the screen in every scene. Like their previous pairing, Fairbanks and Love also make a great couple on screen, with acting styles and on-screen chemistry that make them seem like a natural couple. Even the "insta-romance" between the characters doesn't bother me that much here, because Fairbanks and Love compliment each other so well.

Speaking of Love, I noticed that she spends most of her scenes either sitting down or leaning against posts or walls after taking just a few steps. I don't know if this is just some weird coincidence or if it was supposed to be a character quirk, but I also found myself wondering if perhaps Love perhaps had hurt one of her legs or perhaps her back. What little research I felt inclined to do didn't reveal anything specific, so if it was anything, it was probably just a sprained ankle.

Another bit I noticed--that is either a coincidence or an intentional sight gag--was a rider having trouble with his horse both times the band of outlaws saddled up and rode out en-masse. I'm hoping it was an intentional ittle background thing. Perhaps there was even something involving a clumsy comic relief character that ended up getting cut when the film was reportedly shortened for its 1923 release... I wish my imagining is true, because a cowboy outlaw who can't stay on a horse would be hilarious. (Unforunately, we will never know, because there are no known surviving copies of the original 1916 cut.)

Aside from excellent performances from the film's stars, Sam de Grasse has a fine turn as a local bandit leader whose secret connection to "Passin' Through" helps turn the plot upside down and accelerate the film toward its dramatic conclusion. Similarly Pomeroy Cannon, who plays a Federal Marshal who remains a question mark for most of the picture as to whether he was going to be a friend to the main characters or their downfall, also gives a fine supporting performance.

 

"The Good Bad-Man" is one of the films that have been featured in the Screening Room at the YouTube channel that's loosely connected with this blog. If you like westerns and fast-paced silent movies, you're probably going to enjoy this one. Just click below and watch the tale unfold!

Film Clears Boy of False Charges! Read... um, WATCH all about it!

The Evidence of the Film (1913)
Starring: Florence La Badie, Marie Eline, and William Garwood
Directors: Lawrence Marston and Edwin Thanhouser
Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

When a messenger boy (Eline) for a crime, a sharp-eyed film editor (La Badie) spots exonerating evidence accidentially captured on film by a crew working on location.

This may not be the first film to feature filmmaking and the film industry as part of the plot, but I think it may be first one to feature the literal backshop of the cinema business--the editing suite where pieces of film are spliced together into movies.

The various story elements are engaging and the acting is as naturalistic as can be expected from a film of this vintage; Florence La Badie seems particularly subdued in her scenes. William Garwood was the most expressive of actors, doing exaggerated sneaky and dramatic gestures as befitting his villainous character. With only 13-minutes of run-time, there isn't much room for character development, but nearly every character that is involved in some way with the story is given tiny moments that show its personality. This all adds up to a feeling that this story and cast could have supported a much longer film.

As much as I enjoyed this "The Evidence of the Film", any suspense that might have been generated from the poor messenger boy going to jail for a crime he didn't commit is dispelled by the fact the title gives away how he might be exonerated. On a related note, any suspension of disbelief on my part was also completely shattered by the way the film crew didn't seem to care that a child and a man wandered into the shot but just kept on cranking... and that the man didn't notice a camera pointing at him as he enacted his sinister plan to frame the child. Maybe audiences in 1913 didn't think along lines, because movies were still a new thing.

Despite these glaring flaws, I found this to be a highly enjoyable little film, with a talented cast and a well-paced story. It makes me feel it's a terrible shame that not more of the output of the Thanhouser film company has survived to the present day. But at least we have this one--and it's in excellent shape, despite missing its opening and end title cards.

Take a look for yourself by clicking below. And please let me know if you agree or disagree with my take by leaving a comment.

What's here is funny stuff, but...

Take a Chance (1918)
Harold Lloyd, Bebe Daniels, Harry 'Snub' Pollard, William Blaisdell, Belle Mitchell, and Helen Gilmore
Director: Alfred J. Goulding
Rating: Six of Ten Stars

A dapper young man (Lloyd) sets out to woo a pretty cleaning lady (Daniels). Trouble, chaos, and police chases ensue.

 

This is a film that's full of funny bits that are so loosely connected that this film just ends. Literally. Nothing in what little plot we have gets resolved, and if it was a serial I'd be eager to see the next installment, because it ends on quite the cliffhanger. In fact, when the film ended, I thought maybe it was a fragment and that the last few minutes (or maybe an entire second reel) had not survived to the present day... but every description of the film (at IMDB, Wikipedia, and elsewhere) give its run-time as the roughly ten minutes that the version embedded below.

It wasn't a surprising conclusion to reach that I watched a complete version of "Take a Chance", because the version I saw is among one of best preserved and/or restoration jobs of any film from the 1910s I've come across. Nonetheless, it was a disappointing one, because it showed that very little thought was put into what passes for the story here.

Although there are better Harold Lloyd/Bebe Daniels vehicles, this one is still worth watching for a number of reasons. First, Daniels is a joy to watch as always; no one mugged at the camera better than her, nor seemed to be having so much fun or being so annoyed as her. Second, although nearly every one of the loosely connected slapstick and/or comedic chase sequences go on for a little too long, each and every one of them is initially very funny. As a collection of bits, this is an excellent film, but the fact the story presented has a beginning and a middle but no proper end to speak of.

"Take a Chance" is embedded below for your convenience. Take a chance and check it out. See if you agree or disagree with my take... and leave a comment below!

Interesting gothic romance that's too slow in the wind-up

The Portrait of the Lady Anne (1912)
Starring: Florence La Badie, Henry Benham, and William Russell
Director: Lloyd Lonergan
Rating: Five of Ten Stars

A restless spirit (La Badie) manifests from a portrait to stop her descendent (also La Badie) from making the same life-altering mistake that she did.

First off, let me say up front that if you're a fan of gothic romances, you're going to get a kick out of this film. Its strengths with definately amplify your enjoyment while what I view as the film's major drawback may not bother you at all.

From a technical aspect, "The Portrait of the Lady Anne" is impressive for the time in which it was made. The in-camera special effects that make Lady Anne manifest herself are very effective. There are also more involved scene set-ups and coordination of activities during those scenes that is typical for films of this vintage, with some scenes having noteworthy activity taking place in the foreground, middleground and background. The way locations are filmed from several angles is also something that wasn't common at the time. And then there's the cross-cutting to show things at different places happening at the same time.

Wardrobe-wise, the period costumes are fabulous to look at; fans of period dramas will greatly enjoy the elaborate dresses, as well as the ornate outfits worn by the men during the section that takes place during the 18th century. I wonder if one of the marching orders for the filmmakers from the production company was, "Use as many of these costumes as you can... we've paid for them, and we want to get as much milage out of as many of them, in as many productions, as possible!"

When it comes to the story, I remained enamored with the concept of the spirit getting involved in the romantic life of her descendant, but I almost didn't get to the good parts of the movie because the wind-up is so slow. Almost every scene until the final 1/4 or so of the movie goes on too long, usually starting too slow and then lingering for just a bit too long after everything that's worthwhile has happened in it. It isn't until we're treated to Florence La Badie playing the dual role of Lady Anne and her modern-day descendant that the filmmakers get the pacing right. Since this section is already the best part of the film--and where La Badie's talent as an actress and her great screen presence shine brightly; it's easy to see why her was known to audiences even though the studio at which she spent her entire career at never put actors' credits on their films.

Despite the film's slow wind-up, I think that you won't regret sticking with it to the end. I know I didn't. (Another plus -- the film provides the nicety of a denouement. This is another thing that wasn't common to film from this period.)

'Troublesome Secretaries' is a goofy romantic comedy

Troublesome Secretaries (1911)
Starring: John Bunny, Mabel Normand, and Ralph Ince
Director: Ralph Ince

Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

An overprotective father (Bunny) fires his personal secretary (Ince) after he becomes romantically involved with his teenaged daughter (Normand). The girl then launches several schemes to get around her father and be reunited with her heart's desire.

"Troublesome Secretaries" is one of the few surviving films (and film fragments) featuring cinema's first international superstar, John Bunny. He was among a handful of established, well-regarded stage actors who understood and fully embraced the potential of film, and he was as important to building the emerging industry as it was to elevating his star beyond all others. 

By the time of Bunny's death in 1915, it was predicted by film fans and professional critics alike that his name and image would continue on forever in human memory thanks to film. As it turned out, Bunny and his early contribution to the art and business of filmmaking would be all but forgotten by the public at large by the dawn of the 1920s. Barely a decade after is death, most of the films in which he appeared were no longer available, because studios habitually destroyed used film prints and original negatives rather than go through the trouble and expense of storing them.

This film is typical of Bunny's emphasis on films that relied more on character interaction than slapstick, and, despite the films lightning-fast pace, viewers still get a good sense of the father's overbearing and persnickety nature, as well as his daughter's capricious and independent ways. Her boyfriend is the sort of bland male romantic lead that will dominate romantic comedies and mystery films for the next thirty years... or maybe the character got a little more personality in the missing third act of the film.

Contrary to my usual habit, I am reviewing a film that has survived to the present day without it's story intact. I have reviewed other films of which no complete copy exists (this Bessie Love vehicle comes to mind immediately), but I don't typically try to evaluate a film that's missing major chunks of important plot material... and no version of "Troublesome Secretaries" that I've seen appears to have an actual ending. But what we have of this film is still so much fun and so well-made (and even a little modern feeling) is that I still felt it's worth calling attention to. I think even viewers who typically don't like silent movies (but who enjoy sit-coms or absurd comedies) will like this one.

For regular viewers of silent movies, this film is interesting, because we get to see Mabel Normand in an early leading role and we get to see that she had radiant screen presence from the beginning. (There's also the bitter-sweet historical fact that Normand--at the beginning of her career--would follow pretty much the same trajectory as John Bunny did: She became a superstar and a household name... and was all-but-forgotten just a few years after her career ended.)

'What the Doctor Ordered' is okay medicine

What the Doctor Ordered (1912)

Starring: Mack Sennett, Mabel Normand, Edward Dillon, Jack Pickford, Kate Toncray, and J. Jiquel Lanoe

Director: Mack Sennett

Rating: Five of Ten Stars

A wealthy hypochondriac (Sennett) is instructed by his doctor (Lanoe) to go up onto the mountains to benefit from the pure air. The man's wife (Toncray) and teenaged children (Normand and Pickford) come along for the trip. Snowball fights, illicit lovemaking between the daughter and her boyfriend (Dillon) ensue, with it all culminating with members of the family in mortal danger.

That's a long summary for a short movie, but I couldn't figure out a shorter way to put it. Which is odd, because that paragraph also describes almost everything that happens in the film. 

"What the Doctor Ordered" is a fast-moving film where not a second is wasted. In fact, it moves so fast that I wish a little more time had been spent on a few more transition scenes or character interactions to fill in the relationships a bit more. It would have made the film feel less choppy and the story more substantial.

That said, the film is full of raw energy and the actors all give excellent performances. Mabel Normand and Edward Dillon are particularly fun to watch, while Normand's scenes with Jack Pickford have a playfulness in them that will put a smile on your face. Frequent watchers of silent movies may be particularly fascinated to see Mack Sennett in a starring role, since he's usually behind the camera or in very minor parts. 

fdsa

D.W. Griffith brings us a fine drama starring two great actresses

The Mender of Nets (1912)
Starring: Mary Pickford, Charles West, Mabel Normand, Dell Henderson, and W. Chrystie Miller
Director: D.W. Griffith
Rating: Eight of Ten Stars

When a fisherman (West) cheats on his girlfriend (Normand) with the village net-mender (Pickford), the betrayed girl's brother (Henderson) swears vengeance. Will the mender of nets be able to rise to the challenge and become the mender of hearts before blood is spilled? 

 I generally don't enjoy silent dramas, because they are for the most part too,,, well, dramatic. The mostly thin plots, static camera shots, and the over-the-top gesticulating and emoting by the actors combine in waya that just doesn't hold my interest. There's been one director who's works have always captured and held my attention, though: D.W. Griffith.

Griffith's dramas always clip along at a fast pace and there's never a dull moment on screen. Even establishing shots and transition scenes are full of energy and creatively framed. Even a shot of Mary Pickford staring wistfully into the distance and the beginning to smile is more fascinating than the entirety of some other silent dramas I've come across.

"The Mender of Nets" is impressive visually, even holding up nicely when compared to modern films. The outdoor shots and sequences are particularly nice. The story is simple, but Griffith adds suspense and drama through editing techniques and perfectly timed scene changes that were groundbreaking at the time--and which go a long way to making this film watchable today.

This film also remains watchable because of the natural performances by most of featured actors. While there's plenty of silent movie drama emoting, it is tempered and balanced here by a feeling of genuine warmth in Pickford's performance and emotional pain and panic in Normand's performance. Similarly, Dell Henderson seems like a genuinely bloodthirsty lunatic. West gives probably the most "standard" silent movie drama performance, but even he is a little more subdued than what is typical, coming across more in a Shakespearean tragedy way than over-emoting and hyper animated. Griffith once again brought the best out of his cast.

Finally, the film remains impressive because its relatively simple plot occupied by straight-forward characters ends up emerging as multi-layered as it reaches its conclusion. It could have come across as overly sentimental and maudlin, but because Pickford and Normand have such screen presence, and they gave such good performances, it comes across as bitter-sweet and even a little thought-provoking.

The version I watched (and have embedded below) features a modern score that was commissioned specifically for this film. Some viewers dislike it when modern music is applied to silent movies, but when it's well-done--as it is here--I think it helps bring new life to old art.

Take a few minutes to enjoy this classic film, with its new elements (or without... you can simply turn down the volume if you don't want modernity creep into the 100+ year-old short film that you're watching in a digitized format.)

A high-flying early action/comedy!

A Dash Through the Clouds (1912)
Starring: Mabel Normand, Fred Mace, Phillip Orin Parmelee, Jack Pickford, and Sylvia Ashton

Director: Mack Sennett

Rating: Six of Ten Stars

Josephine (Normand) is more fascinated by airplanes and pilots than she is by her would-be boyfriend (Mace). After he jealously acts out and ends up being pursued by an angry, blood-thirsty mob, he comes to appreciate Josephine's love of aviation, as she and a pilot (Parmelee) come from the sky to rescue him.

 

"A Dash Through the Clouds" is a fun little action comedy where Mabel Normand screen presence and more natural acting style than her fellow cast members combine with a sense of excitement and wonder over the still-new technology of flight to almost make up for the thin and somewhat poorly structured storyline of the film.

While watching this film for its entertainment value might be reason enough to check it out, an added bonus is to watch it for the scenes featuring the rickety, early airplane where pilot and passenger sat on the wings, in front of the engine, with nothing between them and the sky. It's even more remarkable to see that it's actually actress Mabel Normand who's taking to the sky onboard the plane. because she glances over her shoulder toward the camera as it is lifting off. 


All the bits with the plane, whether it's landing or taking off, or being shown in flight are fascinating lots of fun to watch--and I imagine viewers who are aviation buffs like our heroine will find it doubly so. While this wasn't the first film to feature the then-new technology of planes, I think it may be the first where a plane and a pilot is a central and indispensable part of the plot.

Click below and join Mabel Normand on a dash through the clouds!  

Trivia: "A Dash Through the Clouds" was Parmelee's first and only film appearance. He was a real-life aviation pioneer--exactly the sort of dashing daredevil he portrays in this film. He died at the age of 25 as his plane crashed on June 1, 1912, just days after completing his scenes for the film. (The film first appeared in theatres on June 26, 1912, almost 110 years to the day of this post appearing.)

Dont be shy. Watch 'Bashful'!

Bashful (1917)
Starring: Harold Lloyd, Bebe Daniels, William Blaisdell, Snub Pollard, Belle Mitchell, and Bud Jamison
Director: Alf Goulding
Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

A shy young man (Lloyd) will inherit millions of dollars if he has a wife and child. When the estate executor (Blaisdell) pays him a visit, his girlfriend (Daniels) pretends to be his wife, and his manservant (Pollard) and cook (Mitchell) set out to find and "borrow" a baby.

"Bashful" hits the ground running and never slows down for its 9-minute running time. The early part of the film is amusing, but things get over-the-top hilarious once the menacing executor of the estate (played with great effect by the giant-of-a-man William Blaisdell) arrives to vet the heir and his family, and the household staff go through their efforts to make sure their employer can present a baby.

As is almost always the case, Harold Lloyd and Bebe Daniels are a joy to watch. This film is made all the more fun by there being a slight role reversal to what was typical in these older films: Daniels' character wants to smooch with Lloyd's character and she isn't afraid to go after him for it. Meanwhile, Lloyd's character is more demure and brushes off her advances. (Daniels played a similar character in "Off the Trolley", which is another Lloyd/Daniels pairing I highly recommend.)

 

As mentioned above, "Bashful" is a fast-moving film, and not a second of screen time is wasted on anything that doesn't move the plot along, or isn't a gag or an extended comedy bit. This might have been an Eight Star film if it had been a little slower in a couple of different ways--or maybe a little longer. The film ends with a couple of MAJOR plot elements unresolved--and they had intersected and were coming to a head as things fade to black. 

I don't think the version I've watched is incomplete, because the ending isn't abrupt and satisfying in the overall context of the film... but I would have loved to see the total chaos and possible brawling and chases that almost certainly descended upon the Lloyd household after. All it would have taken would be another minute or two or run-time (well, and a longer shooting schedule and a bigger budget and...)

I can't go into details about what those plot elements are without ruining some of the film's funniest moments, but I hope you will take a few minutes to check out this great little film. I'm not terribly fond of the music used in this version, but the image quality is fantastic!

And if you feel inclined, let me know if you agree with my view that this would have been an even better film if those severed plot threads and been run out completely.

Men, Women, and In-Between in the Workplace

Mabel's Stratagem (1912)
Starring: Mabel Normand, Fred Mace, and Alice Davenport
Director: Mack Sennett
Rating: Six of Ten Stars

A secretary (Normand) disguises herself as a man so she can get her job back after her boss's jealous wife (Davenport) insists he fire all female staffers and replace them with males.

"Mabel's Stratagem" is a straight-forward and silly comedy about sex, gender, and sexual harassment in the workplace.  The film is 110 years old, but pretty much all of the situational and gender-based humor works almost as well today, what with all the talk about how there's no difference between men and women, how the society is rotten with power imbalance with the hypocritical rich always abusing the workers, and so on.

While the acting styles are outdated, the film is so fast-moving that viewers hardly have time to notice the excessive pantomiming and emoting (except on the part of Fred Mace who really goes above and beyond). In fact, the only serious complaint I can mount is that maybe the film is a little too fast-moving; the story would be more effective if a little more time could have been spent developing the characters. 

"Mabel's Stratagem" is only five minutes, so I recommend you click below and check it out. I think you'll have fun. 

'The Non-Stop Kid' is non-stop funny

The Non-Stop Kid (1918)
Starring: Harold Lloyd, Bebe Daniels, Snub Pollard, William Blaisdell, Billy Fay, Lew Harvey, and Sammy Brooks
Director: Gilbert Pratt
Rating: Eight of Ten Stars

Miss Wiggles (Daniels) is pursued by many suitors, including her true love, Harold (Lloyd). Her domineering father (Blaisdell) has arranged for her to marry Professor Noodle (Harvey), so a desperate Harold decides to impersonate Noodle and steal Miss Wiggles's hand in marriage.

"The Non-Stop Kid" is a swift-moving comedy where we, once again, see Harold Lloyd trying to dodge the domineering father of the lovely Bebe Daniels. There are some portions that feel like throwbacks to the rotten, trouble-making character that Lloyd began his career playing--rather than the tricky romantic that became his signature later on--and these drag the film down a bit for me. (As I've previously noted, I have a strong dislike for those early Lloyd pictures.) Thankfully, those moments are few... in addition to being more funny than anything in the early films they reminded me of.

With the negativity out of the way, let me praise this short film for its 12-minutes of non-stop action and gags. While some work better than others, the scene where Miss Wiggles ) plays a trick on a gang of nattily dressed suitors; the one where Harold is wiping away Miss Wiggles tears and her father interrupts their moment; and the entire afternoon tea sequence makes up for any shortcomings present elsewhere. 

My personal favorite part of the film is the opening bit. The hoard of dimwitted suitors pursuing Daniels' character feel like precursors to the Upperclass Twits that were mainstays in some of the greatest skits from "Monte Python's Flying Circus" and they are every bit as funny.

I strongly recommend you take a few minutes out of your day to check out this great little comedy. Click below... and enjoy! (I had to update the embedded version... and now the best available one has Russian subtitles...)

Silent action film 'A Beast at Bay' holds up

A Beast at Bay (1912)

Starring: Mary Pickford, Alfred Paget, Edwin August, and Henry Lehrman

Director: D.W. Griffith

Rating: Nine of Ten Stars

After a young woman (Pickford) is carjacked and subsequently abducted by an escaped convict (Paget), her boyfriend (August) gives chase along side the prison guards.

"A Beast at Bay" is a clear display of the command that D.W. Griffith had on filmmaking and how he may even have been ahead of his peers in his methods and approaches. The acting, the pacing, the way scenes are staged and framed... almost everything about this film holds up nicely and it almost feels like it could have been made yesterday in a couple of places. This might even be a film that someone who says they think silent movies are dumb or boring or dusty relics can enjoy. It might even make them change their minds.

The film wastes no time getting underway (which is good since it only runs about a 1/4 of an hour), with action and tension from the get-go, switching back and forth between the parallel stories of a convict's escape and a spat between two young lovers. By the time the storylines intersect, viewers have a clear sense that Mary Pickford's character is facing real danger from the menacing bad guy played by Alfred Paget. This is not a mustache-twirling melodramatic villain, but one who feels far more real and who oozes dangerous evil and violence. There's a scene where, if Paget's character hadn't been interrupted, he would have undoubtedly has raped his young prisoner; the sense that is where things were headed was just as clear and horrifying as any 1970s exploitation film, or the slightly more modern revenge genre. It's rare that I have that sort of visceral reaction to a silent movie, because the acting is usually so stylized and overblown--but, as I've noted in previous reviews of Griffith's short films, he was far better at getting more naturalistic performances from actors than his contemporaries. This is one of the big reasons his films have stood the test of time--especially his short films.

The only point in the film where I initially snickered a bit was when the hero and the prison guards try to catch up with the carjacked maiden by commandeering a locomotive and go steaming down a track parallel to the road. "Seriously," I thought to myself, "why not just get a car?"

Then I remembered it was 1912 when this film was made, and it is clearly set in a rural area. The car driven by Mary Pickford's character was probably the only one for miles around at the time the chase began.

And so I was back to not really having anything negative to say about this nice little action film. D.W. Griffith was a visionary pioneer who helped lay the foundation for cinematic story-telling, so it's perhaps not at all surprising that his films can still be exciting to present day viewers. And while I watch mostly old movies these days, so I am perhaps more prone than most to find them exciting, but I really do think there might be enough here to appeal to more "normal" viewers, too.

Check it out my clicking below. Tell me if you agree or disagree in the comments section.

 

'Move On' is worth pausing for

Move On (1917)

Starring: Harold Lloyd, Bebe Daniels, William Blaisdell, and Sammy Brooks

Directors: Billy Gilbert and Gilbert Pratt

Rating: Six of Ten Stars

A patrol officer (Lloyd) and his sergeant (Blaisdell) both have romantic design on a wealthy family's nursemaid (Daniels).

I'm not entirely sure what to make of the version of "Move On" that I found on YouTube. Its content and cast bears only a passing resemblance to the description and cast list both at IMDB and at Wikipedia. Either there are two films from 1917 with the same title and the stars, or there is a chunk of the film that doesn't survive to the present day. It's impossible for me to figure out which (with the level of time I am willing to commit to research that is).

I do suspect that the version of "Move On" I watched (and have embedded below, so you can watch it too) is fairly intact, because its run-time matches the five minutes listed on IMDB. However, there way Harold Lloyd's character enters the first scene he shares with Bebe Daniels makes it seem like something is missing, because it appears that he may have been chasing someone but then decided to make time with the cute girl instead. (Perhaps that's where "Snub" Pollard appears, along with others of the listed cast members, because they are nowhere in this film, except maybe as faceless extras at the very beginning.)

Whether this is a complete film or not, what we have is a fast-moving bit of entertainment. One bit feels like it's missing a pay-off, but otherwise this feels like a complete story. What's better, it has a somewhat surprising ending when compared to other Lloyd/Daniels-led comedies from this period. All-in-all, if you've enjoyed other of their works, I think you'll enjoy this one, too. 

You should witness 'Shep's Race with Death'

Shep's Race with Death (1914)
Starring: Shep the Dog, Marion Fairbanks & Madeline Fairbanks [as the Thanhouser Twins], J.S. Murray, M. Whitcove, and Marie Rainford
Director: John Harvey
Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

Although they are identical twins (Fairbanks and Fairbanks), who have similar personalities and ways of behaving, their grandmother (Whitcove) hates one and loves the other... and she's not shy about either emotion. When the beloved sister lashes out at the grandmother for the mistreatment of her sister, the grandmother convinces their mother (Rainford) to separate the sisters by leaving the hated one with the father (Murray) while leaving with the beloved one away to live at their grandmother's house. But the separation of the sisters and the broken family is only the beginning of the misery and danger.

Shep was a Rough Collie who helped set the mold for heroic dogs like Rin-Tin-Tin and Lassie. He headlined 14 films from 1912 to 1914, and in "Shep's Race with Death", he shares the screen with the "Thanhouser Twins", a pair of girls whose brief film career overlapped with his. The twins were actually Madeline Fairbanks and Marion Fairbanks; their joint screen-name was derived from the production company for which the majority of their films were made. Born in 1900, they appeared in roughly 45 short films between the years of 1912 and 1916. They also had successful stage careers before, during, and after their time in movies, performing both in musical theatre, variety shows, and plays.

As for "Shep's Race with Death", the girls and the dog make great onscreen companions. The affection they show for Shep, and visa-versa, seems genuine, and the scenes where they are playing with each other or otherwise interacting are some of the best parts of the film. (As it should be, since Shep has top billing...)

Another strong suit of the film is that it wastes no time getting started, keeps a breakneck pace throughout, and never gives the viewer much of a chance to notice the overacting that comes with the melodramatic genre to which this film belongs. Despite the swift pace of the film, we're even given a denouement that wraps up the film perfectly while showing off the strength of its stars performing together.

All that said, the film's breakneck pace also works against it. It's confusing that the parents of the twins just fold without any objections or questions when the nasty mother-in-law insists on breaking up the household and making the twin she likes and the wife (her daughter) to come live with her. Perhaps this, one of the greatest intertitles ever made, and which amused me to no end, is so true that they didn't dare stand up to her?

Could the mother-in-law have brought more doom and misery to the household beyond breaking it up? Is that why the parents fold so easily? The film doesn't take the time to explain this, so maybe it's not something that would have crossed the minds of 1914 viewers, but it's a point that bothered me. It also bothers me that there's no resolution of the plotline involving the nasty mother-in-law. She just sort of vanishes from the story and we never see what reaction she might have to the family reuniting happily after the "race with death" of the title. Maybe, before racing with death, Shep pushed the evil mother-in-law off a cliff, or maybe the Dad or the Twins got together and somehow disposed of her? 

Whatever the case, it's something the film doesn't deal with, and I think it might have been stronger if it had. (Sometimes, with films of this age, all we have are fragments, so it's possible there was originally a scene or two that dealt with the mother-in-law later in the film. I find this to be unlikely, since the running time of the version I viewed matches all the running-times listed for this film I've been able to find. I think, in this case, the mother-in-law vanishing is just bad storytelling. 

Despite its flaws, I think that, if you enjoy silent movies, you'll find the quarter of an hour it'll take you to watch "Shep's Race With Death" to be time well spent. Click below and sit back. (And if you feel so inclined, share YOUR opinion of the film in a comment to this post.)

 

'Doctor Cupid' is predictable but still well-done

Doctor Cupid (1911)
Starring: John Bunny, Carlyle Blackwell, and Edith Storey
Director: Unknown

Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

A young poet (Blackwell) disguises himself as a doctor to get around the overly protective father (Bunny) of the woman he loves (Storey).

Although mostly forgotten today, John Bunny was a comedian who became an international screen star during the early days of film. Reportedly, he tended to stay away from slapstick and physical comedy and instead focused on more character- and relationship-based material. That is certainly the case in "Doctor Cupid", which is one of only a handful of the roughly 300 films he appeared in that survive to the present day.

"Doctor Cupid" runs a little over 12 minutes and it doesn't waste a second with its fast-moving, proto-sitcom story that straddles the line between comedy and melodrama. The characters all take the unfolding events very seriously, but there's a sense that the audience isn't necessarily supposed to, from Bunny's obtuse character nodding off during a poetry reading to his daughter becoming literally love-sick when she is forbidden to see the man she barely knows yet has decided is the love of her life. There's the occassional over-emoting that one expects from films of this period, but generally the actors deliver performances that are more in line with what you'd expect from a well-performed stage production. Overall, everyone does an impressive job, especially since there is not a single moment where an actor seems unsure of where they're to direct their energy or where they're supposed to stand in the shot. (There's one bit where Edith Storey's back is to the camera for an awkwardly long period of time, but other than that, the framing of each shot and the actors positioning within it is well above average in competence for films of this period.

If you're in the mood for a bit of light entertainment that occupies a space between a sitcom and a French farce, I think you'll enjoy "Doctor Cupid"; you can watch it right here, right now, as it's embedded below. (And if I steer you wrong, feel free to sound off by leaving a comment beneath this post.)

Harold and Bebe grapple with 'Spring Fever'

Spring Fever (1919)

Starring: Harold Lloyd, Bebe Daniels, Snub Pollard, Noah Young, Fred C. Newmeyer, Marie Mosquini, Gus Leonard, and Raye Hampton

Director: Hal Roach

Rating: Six of Ten Stars

Stricken with Spring Fever, a bookkeeper (Lloyd) leaves work early. He proceeds to cause chaos in the park and find love in the arms of a young lady (Daniels).

"Spring Fever" is a few minutes of fast-paced fun. It hasn't aged as well as some of the other Harold Lloyd/Bebe Daniels team-ups--Lloyd plays a trickster character who is just a tad too obnoxious to be likeable and Daniels plays far more interesting characters in some of their other films together--but director Hal Roach doesn't waste a second of the film's eight minutes of run-time: If characters aren't being established, plot isn't being forwarded, and gags aren't being executed, then gags are being set up.

If you like silent comedies, I think you'll find this one entertaining. It's even more fun to watch if you've seen other of Lloyds and Daniels' vehicles, as you'll recognize some of the locations from other films. Why don't you kick back and take a few minutes to watch it right now?

'Mabel's Strange Predicament' is worth witnessing

Mabel's Strange Predicament (1914)

Starring: Mabel Normand, Charlie Chaplin, Chester Conklin, Harry McCoy, and Alice Davenport

Director: Mabel Normand

Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

A drunk (Chaplin) causes chaos in an hotel and generates romantic strife between couples staying there by making it appear as though a young woman (Normand) is having an affair with a married man (Conklin).

In addition to just being lots of fun, and therefore worth seeing for everybody, "Mabel's Strange Predicament" is a historical artifact that film history buffs need to see for a number of different reasons.

First, this is one of the early incarnations of what we now recognize at the sit-com. We've got characters of markedly different types and circumstances interacting  in a single space, and we have a situation that escalates due to misunderstandings and lack of communication between the characters. (This story structure and configuration has older roots--in French farces, for example--but every element of a sit-com is so clearly present here that it's worth checking out. (Personally, I also found the changes in social standards that have happened in the past 100 years fascinating. Much of the comedy here hinges on Mabel being locked out of her hotel room in pajamas--any time after 1950, I imagine a young lady dressed like that would be embarrassed about having to go to the lobby and ask for help, but she would have to be wearing a sexy negligee or less for the level of mortification that Mabel displays here.)

Second, this was the first film that featured Charlie Chaplin in his "Little Tramp" get-up. According to some sources, the character was conceived in collaboration between Chaplin and director/co-star Mabel Normand in order to give the drunk that Chaplin plays in in this film a unique flair while also emphasizing Chaplin's strengths as a performer. It was a move that saved Chaplin's film career, as Mack Sennett was getting ready to fire Chaplin because he was not adapting well to the differences between performing on stage and performing for cameras. Normand, who had spent most of her working life in front of or behind film cameras, convinced Sennett to give Chaplin some leeway, and over the several films they made together, she taught Chaplin everything she knew... and, eventually, the student became the master! In a quirk of fate that probably went a long way to helping Chaplin perfect the first, more obnoxious incarnation of the Little Tramp character, he ended up starring as the character in a mostly ad-libbed, last minute production. When work on "Mabel's Strange Predicament" was halted due to bad weather, Chaplin and a couple camera crews were dispatched by producer Sennett  to create a film in front of  a crowd attending a soapbox race who had no idea what was going on with Chaplin engaging in antics. (Click here to check out that very funny short film.) 

Of course, "Mabel's Strange Predicament" is also worth seeing for anyone who just wants a few minutes of fun. And you can do so, right here from this post by clicking on the embedded video below!

Krazy Kat in motion

Krazy Kat Goes A Wooing (1916)

Starring: N/A

Director: Leon Searl

Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

Krazy Kat goes to serenade Ignatz Mouse. 

If there ever was a cartoon that needed a better musical score, it's "Krazy Kat Goes A-Wooing". I would love to hear what Krazy Kat is playing on his banjo or even hear what it sounds like when he or she (I have no idea what sex Krazy is, even after all these years) sings. I know this was originally a silent film, but it really needs someone to put together a score that more accurately reflects what's happening on the screen. (All versions I've come across feature piano music, and, with the exception of the one hosted by the Library of Congress--which I've embedded below via YouTube--they all seem to be randomly selected pieces. A score using a banjo, a mouth harp, or maybe just a person humming through an electric fan would be far better, especially if created specifically for this.)

If you've read and enjoyed any of George Herriman's "Krazy Kat" comic strips, I think you'll like this animated trip to the "heppy land that is fur, fur away". Unlike later Krazy Kat animated entries--of which there were well over 250 between the years of 1915 and 1947--this one is close to Herriman's strips in feel and look and overall execution. The odd, yet very cool (or maybe kool) flying car that Krazy Kat travels around in not something I remember seeing before. It's the perfect addition to the animated version, however.

'The False Magistrate' is silent end for Fantomas

The False Magistrate (1914)
Starring: René Navarre, Germaine Pelisse, Mesnery, Suzanne Le Bret, Laurent Morleas, Georges Melchior, and Edmond Breon

Director: Louis Feuillade

Rating: Seven of Ten Stars

A scheme concocted by Inspector Juve (Breon) to make sure the evil mastermind Fantomas (Navarre) is executed for his many crimes and murders goes awry, and Fantomas instead escapes the grasp of law enforcement yet again. Through a series of lucky breaks, Fantomas manages to take over the identity of an investigating magistrate and sets about committing more crimes, now under the cover of law. 

"The False Magistrate" was the last entry in the original silent movie "Fantomas" series. Sadly, it survives only in a degraded and fragmented state. Even the best available restoration features several severely damaged sequences and relies on several added intertitles that provide summaries of what happened in sections of the film that don't even exist anymore. Normally, I would not write a review of a film in this state, but there are a couple of reasons why I make an exception here.

First, I'd already declared I was going to review all five films in this series, without knowing the actual state of the final one. It was included in a set of DVDs that held all the films, and I was so impressed with the first entry in the Louis Feuillade that I couldn't imagine a reason why I wouldn't want to cover all of them.

Secondly, and far more importantly, "The False Magistrate" may actually end up as a better film for its missing pieces. Clearly, some of the elements would have been nice to have--such as the summarized scenes that establish Rose the Maid (Suzanne Le Bret) as being connected with Fantomas's gang, and just more of the gang members in general--but I am almost 100 percent certain that we're better off not having anything but highlights remaining from the plot-threads involving Juve and Fandor, because what we're left with is some of the dumbest stuff in the entire series.

While I complained about the absolutely mind-numbingly silly ending to "Fantomas vs. Fantomas" (1914), this opens with Juve embarking on something even dumber. And it isn't even silly--just dumb--and a prime example of bad writing every way you look at.

Basically, Juve lets Fantomas escape from prison by taking his place. The scheme is clever and even more cleverly executed (through the return of the fat suit used in "Juve vs. Fantomas" (1913)), but what isn't so clever is that no one notices that the party of visiting dignitaries that Juve snuck in with has one less member leaving than when they arrived; nor does any of the guards notice for weeks that someone else is in Fantomas' cell. It gets even worse, because by letting Fantomas back out into the world, Juve should be held accountable for the three murders he commits and the numerous lives he ruins during the course of this film. The less we see of Juve and Fandor in this film, the better off we probably are--although Fandor is the focus of one of the better scenes when he works with a pair of police detectives to trick and capture members of Fantomas' gang.

Setting aside the fact that the only reason there even is a story in this film beyond Fantomas's escape from prison is a series of tremendous coincidences, the fact that we get to see Fantomas engaging in a scheme that is both utterly evil and that also seems realistic. The way he uses his stolen identity as a powerful member of law enforcement to both extort the wealthy and bring renegade members of his gang firmly under his control is very fitting of is supposed criminal genius (unlike some of his activities in previous films). The gruesome way in which he punishes a disloyal gang member, and, for that matter, every murder he commits during the course of the film, also chillingly shows what a psychopath he is. 

Another strong part of "The False Magistrate" is the ending, both how Fantomas is captured and how he escapes (and, no, I don't consider it a spoiler to say that Fantomas escapes yet again... it's part of the genre). Unlike the previous three films, the ending here is nearly perfect.  

This post marks the end of "Fantomas Fridays" at Shades of Gray. But, since we have the DVD collection of Louis Feuillade's other legendary thriller series, "Les Vampires", in the To Be Watched pile, you can expect them to be replaced with "Feuillade Fridays" in the new year. We hope you'll be back!

Strong ideas, weak execution, and a bad ending

Fantomas vs. Fantomas (1914)
Starring: René Navarre, Georges Melchior, Renée Carl, Edmund Breon, and Laurnt Morleas
Director: Louis Feuillade

Rating: Five of Ten Stars

With Inspector Juve (Breon) imprisoned to pacify the public who as become convinced he is the criminal mastermind Fantomas, the real Fantomas (Navarre) works to turn Paris' muggers and petty criminals into his minions and revenue stream... even while launching a scheme to monitor and manipulate police activity from the inside and to assist him in an even more nefarious plot!

"Fantomas vs. Fantomas" is the fourth film in the original silent movie adaptations of the, at the time, hugely popular series of novels revolving around the mysterious criminal mastermind Fantomas and his dogged pursuers Inspector Juve and crusading reporter Fandor… and it's a bit of a mess.

Like the previous film in the series, "The Murderous Corpse", this one has Fantomas and his foes matching wits over several over-lapping schemes, some of which are clever, but all of which end up in a big tangle that blow up into a big mess due to a mix of Fantomas' arrogance and psychopathy.

Like "The Murderous Corpse", this "Fantomas vs. Fantomas" is crammed with great story ideas, but none are executed to the fullest extent of their promise and each might have been better served as the basis for their own film, or at least given more space to develop. Juve's unjust imprisonment and Fantomas' efforts to frame him even harder provide a couple of interesting plot-points, especially since twists linked to it ends up ruining every one of Fantomas' schemes in the film. However, for long stretches of the film, Juve is completely forgotten, because so many other things have to be set up.

The same is true of Fantomas' effort to control and exploit the petty street criminals and muggers of Paris--which starts as a chance encounter when a robbery endangers one of his many false identities. As with Juve's imprisonment and Fantomas' trying to take advantage of it, this endeavor ends up not coming off as the mastermind had hoped. In this case, the failure is linked entirely to Fantomas's greed and arrogance; but it's a storyline that drops from the film for its entire middle section, with a couple of oblique, nonsensical tie-ins with Fantomas' main scheme for this film.

And this main scheme is really where the entire film should have been focused (with perhaps Juve's imprisonment or Fantomas' dealings with the street gangs serving as a subplot). Here, Fantomas is endeavoring to defraud the wealthy and powerful of France by encouraging them to contribute to a bounty fund and then faking his own capture at the hands of an American detective who is actually one of Fantomas himself in one of his many fake identities. One of the best part of the film revolves around the fund-raising ball that Fantomas forces his high society accomplice Lady Beltham (Renee Carl) to host, and which he himself attends--"disguised" as Fantomas. Also attending, and also wearing Fantomas costumes, is crusading reporter Fandor (Georges Melchior) and an undercover police officer. Both Fandor and police assumed that the arrogant Fantamas wouldn't pass up the chance to attend the ball, and that he would become enraged at the sight of someone daring to impersonate him... and they assumed correctly.

 Ultimately, the actions Fantomas takes at the charity ball end up undoing all of his schemes in this film. It was a great idea, and the dominos that fall are all cleverly lined up... but the great idea is clumsily executed and almost ruined by some truly stupid plot conveniences, one of which feels like the writers just said, "Well, we're out of space and time, so let's just do this truly dumb, utterly nonsensical thing to let Fantomas escape to menace the heroes another day!"

Truly, the final seconds of "Fantomas vs. Fantomas" are among the dumbest thing I've ever seen in an film that was supposed to be taken seriously. If this had been a comedy, it would have been perfect; here, it just comes across as lazy, moronic, and startling for all the wrong reasons. It almost ruins the entire film. (On the upside, it all but made me forget about how confusing I find the relationship between Lady Beltham and Fantomas, a point I've mentioned in two previous reviews of this series and which continues in this one.)

Perhaps in 1914 this jumble of great ideas and plot threads that culminate in pure idiocy made more sense; it's based on a novel (maybe more than one?) that viewers were almost certainly familiar with and the writers and director may have left things out because he knew this. To 21st century viewers, the result is a bit lacking, and it feels like a major drop in quality from the first "Fantomas" film and a plunge from the high point of "Juve vs. Fantomas".

 

One final note: I saw another reviewer comment that "Fantomas vs. Fantomas" is a favorite among fans of this series? How? Why? What am I missing? Feel free to enlighten by leaving a comment if you feel so inclined!